Mental Availability Through Marketing

Or…What Netflix can teach us about mental availability through marketing

I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t mildly deflated after listening to Matt Damon and Ben Affleck on The Joe Rogan Experience talking about their movie “The Rip” and how modern streaming culture is shaping filmmaking.

(you can read the full transcript here)

Damon said that part of Netflix’s brief to filmmakers now includes suggestions like:

“Can we get a big one in the first five minutes?… And it wouldn’t be terrible if you reiterated the plot three or four times in the dialogue because people are on their phones while they’re watching.”

Matt Damon

It’s striking on its own.

The idea that Oscar-level storytelling is adapting to multitasking viewers.

But what struck me even more was my second thought. This isn’t just an anecdote about phone screens and plot repetition. It’s a window into how attention itself is being reimagined. This is exactly what good marketing has always had to contend with.

When it comes to mental availability through marketing, we might be making a big mistake

The knee-jerk interpretation is always something like:

Attention spans are shorter now. People are worse at focusing. Blame phones.

Marketers are no strangers to this sort of panic. When attention feels fragmented, the instinct is to shout louder, post more, optimise more, and sometimes over-explain what should have been clear in the first place.

But that’s not what’s happening here. This isn’t a loss of intelligence or interest. It’s a shift in how attention is allocated. And that’s not new.

Ehrenberg-Bass Saw This Coming

For years, the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science has been telling marketers something that now sounds eerily similar to what Damon was describing — attention is rarely full, and yet behaviour still happens.

Their research (read more in How Brands Grow by Byron Sharp) explains that people rarely give brands their full, undivided attention. And yet, brands still grow when they become mentally available because they are easy to recognise and recall under low-attention conditions.

Mental Availability Through Marketing

They call this mental availability through marketing — the probability that a brand comes to mind in the moments where decisions are actually made. It’s not about capturing focus; it’s about being accessible to the distracted mind.

Attention is often partial. But buying decisions still happen.

(This is only a very small part of the published work from Ehrenberg-Bass Institute. I recommend starting with their website for more brilliant insights)

So Why Does Netflix Ask for Repetition? (clue: It’s about mental availability)

What Damon is describing isn’t whimsy. The suggestion that Netflix wants plot beats reiterated “three or four times” in dialogue is grounded in strategies that prioritise retention and engagement data.

In a streaming ecosystem where the next watch is a click away, retaining attention — even fragmented attention — matters commercially. Netflix has built its business on understanding viewing behaviour, and tweaking scripts to accommodate divided attention is an evolution of that model.

Affleck, ever the pragmatist, pushed back a bit, noting that not every show follows this formula and that quality storytelling still cuts through.

But even if this isn’t universal, it’s telling about how major platforms are thinking about audiences.

The Marketing Parallel: It Was Never About Full Attention

Here’s where the Ehrenberg-Bass perspective becomes useful: People almost never give undivided attention to marketing.

Most exposure happens peripherally — in the background, in distraction. Yet, decisions still get made.

This has always been true — even before phones. What’s different is how visible it’s become.

And what Ehrenberg-Bass teaches us is that real brand success doesn’t come from capturing full focus. It comes from mental availability through marketing — being easily recognisable and recallable when the moment of truth arrives.

In marketing terms, that’s built through:

Distinctive brand assets
Clear, consistent messaging
Repetition over time
Strategic presence, not just tactical bursts

That’s not “dumbing down” — it’s designing for the way human brains actually work.

But here’s the thing: attention has always been limited. Full focus was an exception, not a rule. Good storytelling and good marketing has always navigated that reality, not ignored it.

A fragmented viewer doesn’t mean stories don’t matter. It just means that meaning needs to be anchored, not demanded.

So What Does This Mean for Marketers?

Netflix’s approach, Damon’s frankness, and Ehrenberg-Bass’s science all point to the same insight:

Attention isn’t the jackpot. Retrieval is.

Marketing shouldn’t compete with distraction. It should design for memory. The goal is to generate mental availability through marketing.

Which means:

Simplicity isn’t laziness.
Repetition isn’t desperation.
Recognition isn’t ordinary — it’s strategic.
And clarity isn’t a fallback — it’s an advantage.

Good marketing doesn’t hope for attention.
It earns recall.

P.S. If today’s post helped you see marketing a little more clearly, I’ve got tools to help you go even further.

Start with my free resources:

🧭 How to Write a Marketing Plan – a simple framework to bring focus and direction to your marketing.
💡 Brand Health Check – a quick way to see what’s working and where to improve.

If you’re ready to deliver marketing to increase business valuation, these resources are all available in my store:

✨ Brand Archetypes Bundle
🪄 How to Avoid Marketing Mistakes Masterclass
🎓 SME Marketing Academy
🔍 Strategy Intensive
💼 Strategic Marketer Blueprint

Because marketing isn’t about doing more. It’s about doing what matters, with clarity, courage and a little bit of magic.